Overall, the Gigabyte G32QC is much better than the ASUS TUF VG27VQ. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is better than the ViewSonic Elite XG270QG. Unlike the ASUS TUF VG27AQ, this monitor doesn't support ELMB-SYNC, so BFI can only be enabled if FreeSync is disabled. You can download our ICC profile calibration here. Though they share the same design, the VG27AQ has an IPS panel with much better viewing angles, color accuracy, and black uniformity. The wide viewing angles allow you to collaborate with a colleague sitting next to you, while both enjoying the same accurate image. IPS panels don't usually have good native contrast, and this one is better than most. But we're not going to be in a position to do it until Future moves us ov… https://t.co/Z8tuNsZOXz, @TheManicGeek I'm amazed at what the video guys have been able to do. The ASUS has a much better build quality, significantly better ergonomics, and it has a black frame insertion feature that can help reduce the appearance of motion blur. The VG271UP, on the other hand, has a higher native resolution, and it supports HDR, so it might be better for some people, especially if you plan on VESA mounting the monitor and ergonomics don't matter to you. save hide report. The monitor wobbles a bit when nudged, but this isn't too distracting. They both have IPS panels with wide viewing angles, but the contrast ratio is much better on the ASUS. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is better than the ASUS ROG Swift PG279QZ. However, the Acer has better color accuracy and can get brighter in HDR content. The monitor has a great contrast ratio, resulting in deep blacks if you game in the dark, and if you game in a bright room, it does a decent job at handling reflections. The LG, on the other hand, has a higher resolution and supports HDR. However, the VG279Q has better viewing angles, out-of-the-box color accuracy, and gradient handling. The Acer Nitro XF252Q is a better monitor than the ASUS TUF VG27VQ. The viewing angles are poor, so it's not an ideal monitor if you need to share your screen with coworkers. The ASUS VG279Q and LG 27UK650-W have very similar overall performance but are very different. @jeffkibuule I would budget for 1.5x the peak power consumption of all connected devices. ("found that from other reddit suggestions). so that you can compare the results easily. The LG 27GL850-B is slightly better than the ASUS VG279Q for most uses. Hey guys! Good build quality. The ASUS has a 165Hz refresh rate, a quicker response time at 60Hz, and a wider VRR range. The VG27AQ has a mediocre HDR color gamut, and can't display a wide color gamut for HDR content. The ASUS has an IPS panel with wide viewing angles, it has a 1440p resolution, much better ergonomics, and higher peak brightness. The response time at 60Hz on the VG27VQ is decent and it's better than the response time at its max refresh rate. ASUS has introduced a new 27-inch curved display for its TUF Gaming brand of mainstream gaming monitors. Overall, the ASUS TUF VG27AQ is marginally better than the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM. 4. The coverage of the Adobe RGB color space used in photo editing is a bit limited, which might disappoint some professionals. The Acer Predator X27 and the ASUS TUF VG27AQ are very different monitors. Asus TUF Gaming VG289Q 4K Monitor Review: Ultra HD, Ultra Cheap Asus’ VG289Q delivers 4K HDR and Adaptive-Sync for a super-low price. We tested the 27 inch ASUS TUF VG27AQ, which is the only size available for this model. The difference between the two really comes down to personal preference and how you'll be using it. Unfortunately, it has a mediocre contrast ratio, so blacks in a dark room look more like gray and there's no local dimming feature to improve this. The VG27VQ has an incredibly low input lag. I always knew they'd be successful (there has… https://t.co/Ha4nP3mEGn, Sadly, most of the sites AnandTech competed with at the time are no longer with us. Mostly do Xbox one X since its one of only 3 monitors I've ever found on the market that support 1440p @ 120Hz. The VG279Q's ergonomics are also much better, but on the other hand, the G27C4 has a higher contrast ratio due to its VA panel, and it has a slightly higher refresh rate of 165Hz. On the upside, it can get bright enough to combat glare in most environments like an office. It's mainly black with some red on the stand and base. Brand and product names mentioned are trademarks of their respective companies. Superb color accuracy post-calibration. There's height, swivel, and tilt adjustments, but like most curved screen monitors, you can't place it in portrait mode. I thought VA monitors are being curved specifically to counter their inferior off-axis fidelity. Although VA panel monitors have better contrast ratios, it's still one of the better ones we've seen on an IPS, similar to the ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q. I've read some very positive reviews of the ASUS … The monitor couldn't properly display the 10-bit color gradient, although it's advertised as being 8bit+FRC to display 10-bit content. The ASUS' refresh rate is faster, which helps motion look smoother. It supports a black frame insertion (BFI) feature that helps improve the overall appearance of motion and can also deliver more uniform blacks. The monitor supports AMD’s FreeSync variable refresh rate technology with a very decent range between 48 Hz and 165 Hz. The ASUS VG279Q has excellent ergonomics and wide viewing angles, making it easy to share your work with a nearby colleague.

Samsung Galaxy A01 Vs A10s, Super Smash Bros Ultimate Story Mode 2 Player, Euro Rail Package, Accor Logo Vector, Map Of Loop Road Everglades, Trickster Cbc Season 2, South China Kalamazoo, Mi Menu,